Does your school teacher have the right to determine who you make friends with in the school playground?
Did your university dictate your choice of study areas?
How was your relationship arranged?

An acceptable and respectable way to live? The right to choose your friends… Today’s online social network communities give people a powerful way to reach out, connect with old friends, make new friendships, develop relationships, set up pages for special interest areas, avenues to learn new things and educate oneself and others…

If Facebook decides for you… If Facebook cuts you off… if

    Facebook

prevents this interactivity or worse destroys relationships and friendships you have nurtured and/or reignited after a long separation… is this right? Is this responsible behavior? I think not… what would you do if your life was attacked in this manner?

How do you consider that kind of behavior? … Is it friendly to “Unfriend” you from an entire social network? Is this right? Who gives an organization the right to POKE and prod with a big stick, leaving one bruised and battered… and alone? We must fight against this type of behavior, just as we must fight against human trafficking and exploitation in this world…

ONLY YOU can answer these questions about YOUR LIFE… And if you accept this, then all good right?

How did you learn what you know? Where did the information come from? Who wrote it? How long ago? What, if anything does history teach us?

On March 17th 2011, India, China, Russia, Germany and Brazil abstained from voting on a United Nations resolution to approve a no-fly zone over Libya. Abstention in voting does not prevent the passing of the resolution to impose a “No-Fly Zone” over Libya… and the UN resolution just passed does not prevent foreign air craft from flying over Libyan air space… and make no mistake, the resolution is not The 1949 UN Resolution Relevant to Libya’s Independence … those who are hell bent on destruction will no doubt take the initiative to attack swiftly … We should ask… Why the hurry man?

Is the United Nations “family” showing cracks of dysfunctional behavior as it grows older? … or is it worse… rather than growing pains, perhaps it is showing signs of rapid rampant cancerous decay like that being emitted from a radioactive interactive meltdown… unfriendly sibling rivalry? Or perhaps the Rules of Engagement (ROE) have changed within the “UN family”? Who’s being “UN-friendly”? Who’s your daddy now? Who’s the Mother? Are the Kids alright? A Rolling Stone gathers no moss!more on Moss & Stones

“In any engagement, the ROE need to balance two competing goals: The need to use force effectively to accomplish the mission objectives and the need to avoid unnecessary force.” … Humanity needs to stave off calamity!

The late 1990s and early 2000s has seen a significant increase in the use of private military contractors, particularly from United States and Britain, being contracted throughout the world. Contractors such as Blackwater are not bound by the same rules of engagement, standing orders, or levels of accountability as are members of a national military force. This is a military policy problem as the wrongful actions that many civilian security companies have taken part in are taken as the action of the force in country; the actions of civilian security forces hired by a national security organization are taken to be the actions of the country directly. And rightfully so right? If a private company has been contracted by a specific country to assist in fighting a war… no matter where a battle is waged… be it on the ground, in space, in cyberspace, or wherever… “Duh… #WINNING”… where’s the ‘sunSheen’? Or is that ‘sunScream’?

The fights against modern piracy and privacy are soundstages on the battlefields of humanity, where generally agreed ROE should be established by all who are affected by involvement within the boundaries of civilization.

The functionality of communications and the use of online global communities should not be dictated or manipulated by organizational borders or power hungry control freaks, rapid fire policy changes, or regional power groups. If Facebook’s administrators determine what, when and how the ROE are implemented and thereby instantaneously affecting over 500,000,000 people who have subscribed to this social network, then what is there between innocent civilians and a black operation from controlling the fate of over half a billion human beings… or humanity as we know it?

Facebook has become a cyber “No Fly Zone” for a contagion afflicting humanity… and this contagion is complex… it is emotional, financial, hysterical, and sacred… it is threatening humanity… it is threatening life on this planet…

Let’s be clear, let’s stand up and voice our rights… “We will not go quietly into the night… We will not go down without a fight!”

Advertisements